You’re Fired! Prosecutors Quit Over Roger Stone Sentencing Reversal

Written by Emily Kosciewicz

It is rare for Justice Department leaders to reverse decisions of its own prosecutors on a sentencing recommendation. Normally, U.S. attorneys have wide latitude to recommend sentences on cases they prosecute. This norm was challenged earlier this week in the sentencing of Roger Stone.

What is a Sentencing Recommendation?

A few months after the defendant is found guilty in a criminal trial, he returns to court to be sentenced.

The judge will typically receive guidance and assistance from several sources in order to sentence a defendant. One of the things considered is The United States Sentencing Commission’s sentencing guidelines that recommend certain punishments for certain crimes while also considering various factors.

The judge may reflect on a variety of aggravating or mitigating factors. These include whether the defendant has committed the same crime before, whether the defendant has expressed regret for the crime, and the nature of the crime itself.

What Sentence was Recommended for Roger Stone?

Roger Stone was found guilty in November 2019 of obstructing the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 presidential election. It is alleged he tried to set up back-channel communications with WikiLeaks to push for the release of emails stolen from the campaign of Democratic presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton. Stone reportedly also lied to the House Intelligence Committee about his efforts, by denying that he had talked to the Trump campaign about them.

At Stone’s sentencing hearing, the prosecutors initially recommended seven to nine years of prison time. In Stone’s case, prosecutors considered several aggravating factors: threatening to harm someone, interfering with the administration of justice, engaging in a crime that spans years, and obstructing the prosecution in making their sentencing recommendation. According to prosecutors, this recommendation was consistent with the Justice Department’s usual sentencing policy.

As is routine in high-profile prosecutions, the prosecutors on the Stone case discussed their proposed sentencing recommendation with senior officials. But, they apparently came to no clear agreement before the document was filed in court. The prosecutors’ recommendations were ultimately futile, as later the Justice Department intervened and sent a revised recommendation. It withdrew the earlier recommendation, saying it did not reflect the Department of Justice’s position on what would be a reasonable sentence. The new sentence recommendation was far less severe. One Justice Department official blamed this outcome on a breakdown in management. As a result of the sentencing change, four prosecutors abruptly resigned from the case.

This entire ordeal aligned with President Donald Trump’s disapproval of the sentencing recommendation. Speaking on Twitter, the President announced his displeasure and criticized the initial recommendation. Through his tweets, the President ultimately called for a challenge to the sentence.

Some have speculated the prosecutors resigned out of ethical obligations. Likewise, some have suggested the resignations were a protest about political intervention into the case. On the other hand, others, including the President, have suggested the prosecutors resigned simply because they got caught.

Both the Department of Justice and the President have stated the decision to reverse the sentencing recommendation was made independent of the President’s tweets. The prosecutors who resigned have yet to speak publicly about their decision.

Are Sentence Recommendations Usually Changed?

No, sentence recommendations are rarely changed after they are delivered to the court. Many times, especially in high profile cases such as this, prosecutors receive approval from multiple levels before making their decision. This is why the reversal is so rare. Many have speculated the reversal of the sentencing recommendation was a shock because senior officials may have initially approved of the 7–9 year recommendation.

So, Who Decides the Outcome?

Ultimately, the judge, not the Department of Justice, will determine Stone’s sentence. The judge can take any recommendation to heart, and ultimately has the choice to give a sentence the judge deems appropriate. Stone is scheduled to be sentenced on Feb. 20 by D.C. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson. Only then can the public be sure what sentence Stone will serve.

Sources

Department Charging and Sentencing Policy, Office of the Attorney General (May 10, 2017).

Emma Andersson, Why Low-Level Offenders Can Get Longer Sentences Than Airplane Hijackers, ACLU 100 Years (May 24, 2018).

Isaac Chotiner, Did Donald Trump Just Get Roger Stone’s Prison Sentence Reduced?, N.Y. Times (Feb. 12, 2020).

Katie Benner, Prosecutor’s Quit Case After Justice Dept. Intervenes on Sentencing, N.Y. Times (Feb. 11 2020).

Sentencing, Department of Justice (last visited Feb. 15, 2020).

34B N.Y. Jur. 2d Criminal Law: Procedure § 3711.

Photo courtesy of Fox News.

You may also like...